#61
|
||||
|
||||
Ìîæåò ëè ñêîðîñòü ïîòåðè âåñà â ïåðâûå ìåñÿöû ïðåäñêàçàòü äîëãîñðî÷íûé ðåçóëüòàò
Öèòàòà:
|
#62
|
||||
|
||||
Íàéäåí ãåí îæèðåíèÿ?
Íàéäåí ãåí îæèðåíèÿ?
Âïåðâûå áûëà âûÿâëåíà ïðÿìàÿ ñâÿçü ìåæäó ãåíîì è ïðîäóêöèåé áåëîãî æèðà: [Ññûëêè äîñòóïíû òîëüêî çàðåãèñòðèðîâàííûì ïîëüçîâàòåëÿì ] |
#63
|
||||
|
||||
"Ïðèøëî âðåìÿ ìàññîâîãî ïðèìåíåíèÿ áàðèàòðè÷åñêîé õèðóðãèè"
Öèòàòà:
|
#64
|
||||
|
||||
Èñïîëüçîâàíèå ðîáîòà äëÿ æåëóäî÷íîãî øóíòèðîâàíèÿ
Obes Surg. 2015 Sep 19. [Epub ahead of print]
Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, is it Safer than Laparoscopic Bypass? Moon RC1, Gutierrez JC1, Royall NA1, Teixeira AF1, Jawad MA2. Author information Abstract BACKGROUND: Along with the development of technology, robotic approach is being performed for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Some literatures reported same or better peri-operative outcomes with the robotic procedure. The aim of this study is to compare our experience in robot-assisted LRYGB (RA-LRYGB) with LRYGB in terms of peri-operative outcomes. METHODS: From January 1, 2012 to April 30, 2014, a total of 270 patients underwent LRYGB by one surgeon at a single institution. Of these, 64 cases were done robotically. A retrospective review was performed for these patients, noting the outcomes and complications of the procedure. RESULTS: The 64 RA-LRYGB patients had a mean age of 45.9 ± 10.0 years (range, 23-67) and a mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) of 48.4 ± 7.9 kg/m2 (range, 33.8-76.4). The 207 LRYGB patients had a mean age of 45.0 ± 10.7 years (range, 21-67) and a mean preoperative BMI of 48.4 ± 8.1 kg/m2 (range, 34.0-80.4). These two groups were clinically comparable. Mean length of hospital stay was 3.0 ± 4.1 days (range, 1-19) in RA-LRYGB patients, significantly longer than 1.6 ± 1.7 days (range, 1-17) in LRYGB patients (p < 0.01). Thirty-day readmission rate was 9.3 % (n = 6) in the RA-LRYGB group and 6.8 % (n = 14) in the LRYGB group. Higher leak rate was noticed in RA-LRYGB patients at 7.8 % (n = 5), compared to 0.5 % (n = 1) in LRYGB patients (p < 0.01). All the leaks occurred at the pouch level in the RA-LRYGB group, while one leak from the LRYGB group occurred at the gastrojejunal anastomosis site. CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass may result in higher leak rate at the pouch level, when compared to that of laparoscopic procedures. |
#65
|
||||
|
||||
Äèåòà âåòåðèíàðíîãî òèïà:
[Èçîáðàæåíèÿ äîñòóïíû òîëüêî çàðåãèñòðèðîâàííûì ïîëüçîâàòåëÿì] Øóòêà. |
#66
|
||||
|
||||
[Ññûëêè äîñòóïíû òîëüêî çàðåãèñòðèðîâàííûì ïîëüçîâàòåëÿì ]
|
#67
|
||||
|
||||
Îæèðåíèå íå ïðèíîñèò ïîëüçû ïàöèåíòàì ñ ñåðäå÷íî-ñîñóäèñòûìè çàáîëåâàíèÿìè
Öèòàòà:
|
#68
|
||||
|
||||
Óðîâåíü îïèîèäíûõ ðåöåïòîðîâ ìîçãà íîðìàëèçóåòñÿ ïîñëå áàðèàòðè÷åñêîé îïåðàöèè
Öèòàòà:
|
#69
|
||||
|
||||
Íàáîð èçáûòî÷íîãî âåñà âî âðåìÿ áåðåìåííîñòè èìååò äîëãîñðî÷íûå ïîñëåäñòâèÿ
Öèòàòà:
|
#70
|
||||
|
||||
Øâåäñêèå ó÷åíûå óñòàíîâèëè: ëó÷øå ìåíüøå äâèãàòüñÿ, ÷åì áîëüøå åñòü
Öèòàòà:
|
#71
|
||||
|
||||
Ìàê-Äîíàëüäñ ââåë â ìåíþ ñâîèõ ðåñòîðàíîâ â ßïîíèè íîâîå áëþäî: æàðåíàÿ êàðòîøêà â øîêîëàäíîì ñîóñå.
[Èçîáðàæåíèÿ äîñòóïíû òîëüêî çàðåãèñòðèðîâàííûì ïîëüçîâàòåëÿì] Äëÿ ðàñêðóòêè íîâîââåäåíèÿ èõ ðåêëàìùèêè ïðèäóìàëè äåâèç McChoco Potatoes - íîâûé ãàðìîíè÷íûé âêóñ. Äëÿ ñïðàâêè: McChoco Potatoes ìîæíî ïðèáëèçèòåëüíî ïåðåâåñòè êàê "Êàðòîôåëü Ìàê-Øîêî" |
#72
|
||||
|
||||
Åñëè êóøàòü ìíîãî ìÿñà è ìíîãî íàòóðàëüíîãî âèòàìèíà Ñ /ïëþñ îòñåáÿòèíà: è íå ïðåíåáðåãàòü íåáîëüøèì êîëè÷åñòâîì êà÷åñòâ. àëêîãîëÿ/, äà åùå ïðèíèìàòü ïðåïàðàòû æåëåçà-2 âíóòðü (50 ìã/äåíü), òî ìîæíî ïðåäóïðåäèòü ðàçâèòèå æåëåçîäåôèöèòà ïîñëå áàðèàòðè÷åñêîé îïåðàöèè:
For patients who have undergone RYGB, consuming high, but realistic amounts of heme iron in meat, vitamin C from food, and adherence to recommended iron supplements can prevent iron deficiency. [Ññûëêè äîñòóïíû òîëüêî çàðåãèñòðèðîâàííûì ïîëüçîâàòåëÿì ]
__________________
Èñêðåííå, Âàäèì Âàëåðüåâè÷. |
#73
|
||||
|
||||
Ó÷åíûå íàçâàëè ïðè÷èíó ãëîáàëüíîãî îæèðåíèÿ
Öèòàòà:
|
#74
|
||||
|
||||
Öåíòðàëüíîå îæèðåíèå ïðè íîðìàëüíîé ìàññå òåëà. Âëèÿíèå íà ñìåðòíîñòü.
Öèòàòà:
Êîììåíòàðèé: ïåðåâîä÷èê èñïîëüçîâàë ñîêðàùåíèå ÎÒÁ: Îòíîøåíèå Òàëèÿ / Áåäðî, òîãäà êàê â îðèãèíàëå ñòàòüè ([Ññûëêè äîñòóïíû òîëüêî çàðåãèñòðèðîâàííûì ïîëüçîâàòåëÿì ]) èñïîëüçîâàí òåðìèí WHR (waist/hip ratio).  àíãëèéñêîì ÿçûêå hip îçíà÷àåò çîíó íà óðîâíå ìàêñèìàëüíîé îêðóæíîñòè ÿãîäèö, òî åñòü îòíîñèòñÿ ñêîðåå ê òàçó. Ñ äðóãîé ñòîðîíû, äëÿ ðóññêîãî âðà÷à ñëîâî "áåäðî" îçíà÷àåò âñå-òàêè íå òàç, à íîãó îò ïàõà äî êîëåíà. Òàêèì îáðàçîì, ïåðåâîäèòü WHR êàê ÎÒÁ - çíà÷èò çàòóìàíèâàòü çíà÷åíèå òåðìèíîâ. Òåì áîëåå, ÷òî ñðåäè èíäåêñîâ öåíòðàëüíîãî îæèðåíèÿ åñòü åùå òàêîé êàê WTR (waist-thigh ratio) — ñîîòíîøåíèå îêðóæíîñòü òàëèè / îêðóæíîñòü íîãè â âåðõíåé òðåòè áåäðà. Âîò åãî íàâåðíîå ìîæíî ïåðåâåñòè êàê "ÎÒÁ". |
#75
|
||||
|
||||
Ïîñòîðîííèå çâóêè óâåëè÷èâàþò îáúåì ñúåäàåìîé ïèùè
Öèòàòà:
Êîììåíòàðèé: Ïî-ïîåìó, âñå ýòî êàêàÿ-òî ôèãíÿ (ïðîøó ïðîùåíèÿ çà íåàêàäåìè÷åñêèé ÿçûê). Òèïà: "áðèòàíñêèå ó÷åíûå âûÿñíèëè...". |