Показать сообщение отдельно
  #64  
Старый 22.09.2015, 00:18
Аватар для Fedenko
Fedenko Fedenko вне форума
ВРАЧ
 
Регистрация: 14.04.2010
Город: moscow
Сообщений: 396
Сказал(а) спасибо: 10
Поблагодарили 75 раз(а) за 63 сообщений
Fedenko этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеFedenko этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеFedenko этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеFedenko этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форуме
Использование робота для желудочного шунтирования

Obes Surg. 2015 Sep 19. [Epub ahead of print]
Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, is it Safer than Laparoscopic Bypass?
Moon RC1, Gutierrez JC1, Royall NA1, Teixeira AF1, Jawad MA2.
Author information
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Along with the development of technology, robotic approach is being performed for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Some literatures reported same or better peri-operative outcomes with the robotic procedure. The aim of this study is to compare our experience in robot-assisted LRYGB (RA-LRYGB) with LRYGB in terms of peri-operative outcomes.
METHODS:
From January 1, 2012 to April 30, 2014, a total of 270 patients underwent LRYGB by one surgeon at a single institution. Of these, 64 cases were done robotically. A retrospective review was performed for these patients, noting the outcomes and complications of the procedure.
RESULTS:
The 64 RA-LRYGB patients had a mean age of 45.9 ± 10.0 years (range, 23-67) and a mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) of 48.4 ± 7.9 kg/m2 (range, 33.8-76.4). The 207 LRYGB patients had a mean age of 45.0 ± 10.7 years (range, 21-67) and a mean preoperative BMI of 48.4 ± 8.1 kg/m2 (range, 34.0-80.4). These two groups were clinically comparable. Mean length of hospital stay was 3.0 ± 4.1 days (range, 1-19) in RA-LRYGB patients, significantly longer than 1.6 ± 1.7 days (range, 1-17) in LRYGB patients (p < 0.01). Thirty-day readmission rate was 9.3 % (n = 6) in the RA-LRYGB group and 6.8 % (n = 14) in the LRYGB group. Higher leak rate was noticed in RA-LRYGB patients at 7.8 % (n = 5), compared to 0.5 % (n = 1) in LRYGB patients (p < 0.01). All the leaks occurred at the pouch level in the RA-LRYGB group, while one leak from the LRYGB group occurred at the gastrojejunal anastomosis site.
CONCLUSIONS:
Robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass may result in higher leak rate at the pouch level, when compared to that of laparoscopic procedures.
Ответить с цитированием