Показать сообщение отдельно
  #503  
Старый 13.04.2012, 12:43
Igor73 Igor73 вне форума ВРАЧ
Врач-участник форума
      
 
Регистрация: 17.03.2005
Город: Москва
Сообщений: 1,195
Поблагодарили 69 раз(а) за 53 сообщений
Igor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форуме
Тромбоз стентов, мета-анализ. Lancet.

http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2812%2960324-9/fulltext?elsca1=ETOC-LANCET&elsca2=email&elsca3=Cardiology


Summary

Background

The relative safety of drug-eluting stents and bare-metal stents, especially with respect to stent thrombosis, continues to be debated. In view of the overall low frequency of stent thrombosis, large sample sizes are needed to accurately estimate treatment differences between stents. We compared the risk of thrombosis between bare-metal and drug-eluting stents.

Methods

For this network meta-analysis, randomised controlled trials comparing different drug-eluting stents or drug-eluting with bare-metal stents currently approved in the USA were identified through Medline, Embase, Cochrane databases, and proceedings of international meetings. Information about study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample characteristics, and clinical outcomes was extracted.

Findings

49 trials including 50 844 patients randomly assigned to treatment groups were analysed. 1-year definite stent thrombosis was significantly lower with cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents (CoCr-EES) than with bare-metal stents (odds ratio [OR] 0·23, 95% CI 0·13—0·41). The significant difference in stent thrombosis between CoCr-EES and bare-metal stents was evident as early as 30 days (OR 0·21, 95% CI 0·11—0·42) and was also significant between 31 days and 1 year (OR 0·27, 95% CI 0·08—0·74). CoCr-EES were also associated with significantly lower rates of 1-year definite stent thrombosis compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents (OR 0·28, 95% CI 0·16—0·48), permanent polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents (OR 0·41, 95% CI 0·24—0·70), phosphorylcholine-based zotarolimus-eluting stents (OR 0·21, 95% CI 0·10—0·44), and Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (OR 0·14, 95% CI 0·03—0·47). At 2-year follow-up, CoCr-EES were still associated with significantly lower rates of definite stent thrombosis than were bare-metal (OR 0·35, 95% CI 0·17—0·69) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (OR 0·34, 95% CI 0·19—0·62). No other drug-eluting stent had lower definite thrombosis rates compared with bare-metal stents at 2-year follow-up.

Interpretation

In randomised studies completed to date, CoCr-EES has the lowest rate of stent thrombosis within 2 years of implantation. The finding that CoCr-EES also reduced stent thrombosis compared with bare-metal stents, if confirmed in future randomised trials, represents a paradigm shift.
Ответить с цитированием