Дискуссионный Клуб Русского Медицинского Сервера
MedNavigator.ru - Поиск и подбор лечения в России и за рубежом

Вернуться   Дискуссионный Клуб Русского Медицинского Сервера > Форумы врачебных консультаций > Кардиология > Форум для общения врачей кардиологов

Ответ
 
Опции темы Поиск в этой теме Опции просмотра
  #1  
Старый 14.03.2008, 21:44
Igor73 Igor73 вне форума ВРАЧ
Врач-участник форума
      
 
Регистрация: 17.03.2005
Город: Москва
Сообщений: 1,195
Поблагодарили 69 раз(а) за 53 сообщений
Igor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форуме
Закрытие ООО не снижает число приступов мигрени

Title: Migraine Intervention With STARFlex Technology (MIST)
Trial Sponsor: NMT Medical Inc.
Year Published 2008
Summary Posted: 3/10/2008
Writer: [Ссылки доступны только зарегистрированным пользователям ]
Author Disclosure: Honoraria from Genesis Associates, HRA, The Frankel Group, Propagate Pharma, Hagen/Sinclair Research Recruiting, Marketing Research Services of Houston, Medical Marketing Conference, Boston Scientific, KCI Partners, DBA Innovative Medical, and Access Closure.
Reviewer: [Ссылки доступны только зарегистрированным пользователям ]

Description

The goal of this trial was to evaluate closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) compared with a sham procedure in patients with refractory migraine headache.
Hypothesis
Closure of a PFO with the STARFlex device will be more effective in reducing migraine headache.
Drugs/Procedures Used
After general anesthesia, patients underwent transesophageal echocardiography to assess the interatrial septal anatomy. Patients were then randomized to PFO closure (n = 74) or a sham procedure that consisted of a skin incision (n = 73).
Concomitant Medications
Patients received aspirin (300 mg) and clopidogrel (300 mg) 24 hours prior to the procedure and for 90 days after the procedure at a dose of 75 mg daily for both medications. Patients continued any prophylactic medication that they were on at the start of the trial.
Principal Findings
Of the migraine patients referred for potential study enrollment, a right-to-left shunt from a moderate-to-large PFO was documented by transthoracic echocardiography in 38%. Any type of shunt, including atrial septal defect, was present in 60%. The mean number of migraine attacks in the 30 days prior to the procedure was 4.82 in the closure group and 4.51 in the sham group. No PFO was identifiable in 7% of the closure group. Residual moderate-to-large right-to-left shunt was present in four patients at 6 months. There were more serious procedural-related adverse events in the closure group (atrial fibrillation, n = 2; pericardial tamponade, n = 2; retroperitoneal hemorrhage, n = 1; and chest pain, n = 2).

Three patients in each group reported migraine cessation (p = 1.0). Similarly, for closure versus sham, there was no difference in any of the secondary endpoints; frequency of migraine attacks per month (3.23 vs. 3.52, p = 0.14), total MIDAS headache score (17 vs. 18, p = 0.88), or headache days per 3 months (18 vs. 21, p = 0.79).

No difference in treatment effect was noted, regardless of whether a residual shunt was present at follow-up. Two patient outliers accounted for one-third of the study headache burden. When these patients were removed from analysis, there was a reduction of 2.2 headache days per month in the closure group versus 1.3 days per month in the sham group (p = 0.027).
Interpretation
This was the first randomized sham-controlled trial to study the effect of PFO closure in patients with refractory migraine. An important finding was that among migraine patients referred for analysis, some type of right-to-left shunt was documented in 60% (in 38% due to PFO). The primary outcome, cessation of migraine, occurred in three patients in each group. Secondary outcomes such as frequency of migraines and headache scores were also similar between the two groups.

When the two patient outliers were excluded from analysis, a difference was noted in the reduction of headache days favoring PFO closure; however, this finding should only be hypothesis generating since it was a post-hoc analysis.

Failure to detect a difference between treatment groups may have been at least partly explained by lack of adequate power. It is unknown if a longer duration of follow-up to allow for more complete healing of the defect would have also been beneficial. Additionally, patients continued prophylactic medications throughout the trial, which may have made it more difficult for the PFO device to show benefit. Additional trials on the topic are forthcoming.
[Ссылки доступны только зарегистрированным пользователям ]
Ответить с цитированием
Ответ



Ваши права в разделе
Вы не можете создавать темы
Вы не можете отвечать на сообщения
Вы не можете прикреплять файлы
Вы не можете редактировать сообщения

BB коды Вкл.
Смайлы Вкл.
[IMG] код Вкл.
HTML код Выкл.



Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 00:03.




Работает на vBulletin® версия 3.
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.