Парадоксальное взаимоотношение индекса массы тела и смертности

[Igor73]

Wael Galal et al Relation of Body Mass Index to Outcome in Patients With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
Am J Cardiology, V. 99, Issue 11, Pages 1485-1490 (01 June 2007)

Increased body mass index (BMI), a parameter of total body fat content, is associated with an increased mortality in the general population. However, recent studies have shown a paradoxic relation between BMI and mortality in specific patient populations. This study investigated the association of BMI with long-term mortality in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. In a retrospective cohort study of 5,950 patients (mean age 61 ± 13 years; 67% men), BMI, cardiovascular risk markers (age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, current smoking, angina pectoris, old myocardial infarction, heart failure, hypercholesterolemia, and previous coronary revascularization), and outcome were noted. The patient population was categorized as underweight, normal, overweight, and obese based on BMI according to the World Health Organization classification. Mean follow-up time was 6 ± 2.6 years. Incidences of long-term mortality in underweight, normal, overweight, and obese were 39%, 35%, 24%, and 20%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis model, the hazard ratio (HR) for mortality in underweight patients was 2.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7 to 3.7). Overweight and obese patients had a significantly lower mortality than patients with a normal BMI (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.6 to 0.7, for overweight; HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.5 to 0.7, for obese patients). In conclusion, BMI is inversely related to long-term mortality in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. A lower BMI was an independent predictor of long-term mortality, whereas an improved outcome was observed in overweight and obese patients.
[Ссылки доступны только зарегистрированным пользователям ]

[Igor73]

Seth Uretsky et al. Obesity Paradox in Patients with Hypertension and Coronary Artery Disease. The American Journal of Medicine (2007) 120, 863-870[Ссылки доступны только зарегистрированным пользователям ]
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: An obesity paradox, a “paradoxical” decrease in morbidity and mortality with increasing body mass index (BMI), has been shown in patients with heart failure and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, whether this phenomenon exists in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease is not known.

METHODS:

A total of 22,576 hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease (follow-up 61,835 patient years, mean age 66+/-9.8 years) were randomized to a verapamil-SR or atenolol strategy. Dose titration and additional drugs (trandolapril and/or hydrochlorothiazide) were added to achieve target blood pressure control according to the Sixth Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure targets. Patients were classified into 5 groups according to baseline BMI: less than 20 kg/m2 (thin), 20 to 25 kg/m2 (normal weight), 25 to 30 kg/m2 (overweight), 30 to 35 kg/m2 (class I obesity), and 35 kg/m2 or more (class II-III obesity). The primary outcome was first occurrence of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke.

RESULTS: With patients of normal weight (BMI 20 to25 kg/m2) as the reference group, the risk of primary outcome was lower in the overweight patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.86, P.001), class I obese patients (adjusted HR 0.68, 95% CI, 0.59-0.78, P.001), and class II to III obese patients (adjusted HR 0.76, 95% CI, 0.65-0.88, P .001). Class I obese patients had the lowest rate of primary outcome and death despite having smaller blood pressure reduction compared with patients of normal weight at 24 months (-17.5+/-21.9 mm Hg/-9.8+/-12.4 mm Hg vs -20.7+/-23.1 mm Hg /-10.6+/-12.5 mm Hg, P.001).

CONCLUSION:

In a population with hypertension and coronary artery disease, overweight and obese patients had a decreased risk of primary outcome compared with patients of normal weight, which was driven primarily by a decreased risk of all-cause mortality. Our results further suggest a protective effect of obesity in patients with known cardiovascular disease in concordance with data in patients with heart failure and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.