Показать сообщение отдельно
  #2  
Старый 17.10.2007, 14:08
Igor73 Igor73 вне форума ВРАЧ
Врач-участник форума
      
 
Регистрация: 17.03.2005
Город: Москва
Сообщений: 1,195
Поблагодарили 69 раз(а) за 53 сообщений
Igor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеIgor73 этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форуме
Obesity paradox

Seth Uretsky et al. Obesity Paradox in Patients with Hypertension and Coronary Artery Disease. The American Journal of Medicine (2007) 120, 863-870[Ссылки доступны только зарегистрированным пользователям ]
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: An obesity paradox, a “paradoxical” decrease in morbidity and mortality with increasing body mass index (BMI), has been shown in patients with heart failure and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, whether this phenomenon exists in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease is not known.
METHODS:
A total of 22,576 hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease (follow-up 61,835 patient years, mean age 66+/-9.8 years) were randomized to a verapamil-SR or atenolol strategy. Dose titration and additional drugs (trandolapril and/or hydrochlorothiazide) were added to achieve target blood pressure control according to the Sixth Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure targets. Patients were classified into 5 groups according to baseline BMI: less than 20 kg/m2 (thin), 20 to 25 kg/m2 (normal weight), 25 to 30 kg/m2 (overweight), 30 to 35 kg/m2 (class I obesity), and 35 kg/m2 or more (class II-III obesity). The primary outcome was first occurrence of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke.

RESULTS: With patients of normal weight (BMI 20 to25 kg/m2) as the reference group, the risk of primary outcome was lower in the overweight patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.86, P.001), class I obese patients (adjusted HR 0.68, 95% CI, 0.59-0.78, P.001), and class II to III obese patients (adjusted HR 0.76, 95% CI, 0.65-0.88, P .001). Class I obese patients had the lowest rate of primary outcome and death despite having smaller blood pressure reduction compared with patients of normal weight at 24 months (-17.5+/-21.9 mm Hg/-9.8+/-12.4 mm Hg vs -20.7+/-23.1 mm Hg /-10.6+/-12.5 mm Hg, P.001).
CONCLUSION:

In a population with hypertension and coronary artery disease, overweight and obese patients had a decreased risk of primary outcome compared with patients of normal weight, which was driven primarily by a decreased risk of all-cause mortality. Our results further suggest a protective effect of obesity in patients with known cardiovascular disease in concordance with data in patients with heart failure and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Ответить с цитированием